⚖️
Honest Review
Evaluates rigor, not orthodoxy
Specialist AI agents evaluate scientific rigor — consistency, math validity, falsifiability — without judging whether your theory is “mainstream.” Paradigm neutrality is built in.
theoryofeverything.ai
Your science,
seen clearly.
Submit your theoretical framework. Specialist AI agents review your math, sources, and science independently. Build a living body of work with linked papers and versioned reviews. No gatekeeping — just rigorous, paradigm-neutral review. We judge your logic, not your orthodoxy.
Latest default model update: GPT-5.4 (March 2026). We publish timestamped model upgrades regularly.
What a Review Looks Like
Every submission is evaluated across seven dimensions of scientific rigor. No single score determines publication — it's the whole picture that matters. Here's a sample review and what each dimension means.
AI Review — Sample FrameworkPublished
Internal Consistency
4/5
Mathematical Validity
5/5
Falsifiability
4/5
Clarity
3/5
Novelty
4/5
Completeness
3/5
Evidence Strength
4/5
🔗
Internal Consistency
Are your claims logically coherent throughout?
∑
Mathematical Validity
Are equations correctly derived and notation sound?
🎯
Falsifiability
Does the work make specific, testable predictions?
💡
Clarity
Can a scientifically literate reader follow the reasoning?
✨
Novelty
Does this offer something genuinely new?
📐
Completeness
Are boundary conditions and limitations addressed?
📊
Evidence Strength
How well do supporting papers substantiate the claims?
Built on Three Principles
🛤️
No Dead Ends
Not ready for publication? You enter the Conceptual Track with a personalized improvement roadmap. Every submission gets a path forward — not a rejection slip.
🧬
Living Frameworks
Your work isn't a static PDF. Link supporting papers, re-analyze as evidence grows, and build a versioned body of work that evolves with your research.
Not One AI — A Panel of Specialists
Every submission is reviewed by independent specialist agents, each focused on a different aspect of scientific rigor. A coordinator agent synthesizes their findings into a unified assessment.
∑
Math / Logic Agent
Checks derivations, dimensional consistency, and mathematical coherence.
📚
Sources / Evidence Agent
Validates references, checks citation claims, and evaluates evidence strength.
🔬
Science / Novelty Agent
Assesses falsifiability, novelty, and scientific contribution beyond existing work.
🧠
Coordinator
Reads all specialist reports and your paper in full. Produces the final assessment, scores, and roadmap.
Multiple AI models run in parallel per specialist — cross-model consensus strengthens every review.
How It Works
Submit Your Work
Upload your framework or paper in Markdown, TeX, or plain text. AI extracts your title, summary, and key metadata automatically.
Multi-Agent Review
Specialist AI agents — Math/Logic, Sources/Evidence, and Science/Novelty — independently evaluate your work, then a coordinator synthesizes the findings.
Iterate or Publish
Meet the threshold? You're published. Below it? You enter the Conceptual Track with a clear improvement roadmap. Every submission gets a path forward.
Build Your Body of Work
Link supporting papers to your framework. As your evidence grows, re-analyze to update your composite score. The record shows your work evolving.
Who It's For
Independent Researchers
No institutional affiliation required. Your science is judged on rigor, not credentials.
Theoretical Physicists
Get structured AI feedback on consistency, math validity, and falsifiability before journal submission.
Framework Builders
Build a living body of work — framework plus supporting papers — that grows as evidence accumulates.
Science Enthusiasts
Explore cutting-edge theoretical frameworks reviewed for scientific rigor, not popularity.
Endorsement Ready
Share a permanent review profile with scores, specialist reports, and iteration history — the due diligence is already done.
Our Mission
The best ideas in science don't always come from the biggest institutions. Throughout history, breakthroughs have come from people working at the edges —outsiders with notebooks, questions, and the stubbornness to keep going when no one would listen.
The problem was never talent. It was access.
Today, AI changes that equation. When rigorous, unbiased review is available to anyone — regardless of credentials, affiliation, or geography — science stops being a gated community and becomes a shared pursuit.
Join the Beta
We're building a growing community of independent researchers to help shape the platform. Your scores may not reflect the full quality of your work — you're helping us calibrate the system.
No spam. We'll reach out when your beta access is ready.
More Than a Review Tool
TOEShare is a full research infrastructure. Here's what's built in.
Paper-to-Paper Linking
Declare explicit relationships: sequel, extends, corrects, contradicts.
Community Discussion
Comment, vote, and discuss any published work with fellow researchers.
Score Disputes
Challenge any dimension score with evidence. The AI re-evaluates with your feedback.
Semantic Search
Find related work by meaning, not just keywords. Vector embeddings power similarity.
Endorsement Certificates
Export a printable review certificate for any published submission.
Full Review History
Every review is versioned. Track score evolution and content changes over time.
LaTeX & Markdown
Full math rendering — inline and block equations display beautifully.
PDF Upload
Drop a PDF and we extract the text automatically for review.
Ask the AI
Chat with an AI that has your paper's full context loaded — ask anything.